This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit] Fix gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp
- From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 01:11:18 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: [commit] Fix gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp
On my new OpenBSD/alpha systems "x /i $pc" doesn't always print
something that has trailing spaces or tabs. This removes them from
the regular expressions.
Comitted as obvious,
Mark
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.1231
diff -u -p -r1.1231 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 7 Jul 2006 12:53:47 -0000 1.1231
+++ ChangeLog 7 Jul 2006 23:08:10 -0000
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2006-07-08 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
+ * gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp (test_stepi): Do not include trailing
+ spaces/tabs in regular expressions since they might not be there.
+
2006-07-07 Andrew Stubbs <andrew.stubbs@st.com>
* gdb.base/ifelse.exp: New file.
Index: gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 alpha-step.exp
--- gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp 29 May 2005 01:58:52 -0000 1.1
+++ gdb.arch/alpha-step.exp 7 Jul 2006 23:08:10 -0000
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ proc test_stepi {function } {
# Extra check to make sure we stopped on the FP branch instruction.
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
- "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function\[ \t\]+.*" \
+ "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function.*" \
"Check breakpoint on fb$function instruction (first call)"
# Step test, followed by the check that we landed on the expected
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ proc test_stepi {function } {
"stepi on fb$function (first call)"
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
- "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+ret\[ \t\]+.*" \
+ "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+ret.*" \
"Check stepi over fb$function stopped on ret"
# Continue again. FUNCTION should be called a second time, this time
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ proc test_stepi {function } {
# Extra check to make sure we stopped on the FP branch instruction.
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
- "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function\[ \t\]+.*" \
+ "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fb$function.*" \
"Check breakpoint on fb$function instruction (second call)"
# Step test, branch should not be taken.
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ proc test_stepi {function } {
# Extra check to verify that we landed on the instruction we expected.
gdb_test "x /i \$pc" \
- "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fneg\[ \t\]+.*" \
+ "0x\[0-9a-fA-F\]+ <.*>:\[ \t\]+fneg.*" \
"Check stepi over fb$function stopped on fneg instruction"
}