This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] New substitute-path commands
> Given your later explanation that you only support one entry, I find
> "substitute-path add" a bit confusing. Shall we take a moment to think
> about a general interface for lists?
>
> If we had one, we could use it for other variables, and we could access
> this using something like -gdb-set.
Would you mind making a design proposal? I'm not sure to understand
what you exactly you are thinking about. I think I understand the fact
that you would like to have more than one rule because "add" doesn't
suggest "replace", but I am not sure I get the rest :-/.
Thanks,
--
Joel