This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] decimal float point patch based on libdecnumber: testcase


So what is XFAIL intended for?  In my opinion, it is intended for failure, 
but an expected failure.  I guess it can be used for such situation like:
the output is expected, but is not what we want at last.  We might fix 
that at a later time.  

Just my two cents anyway.  Correct me if I am wrong.

Thanks
- Wu Zhou

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 02:39:41AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > > > Do you mean that we need to output something more close to the fact. to 
> > > > say, "Addition/Multiple of decimal floating point is not supported right 
> > > > now".  or something other like this.  If you want, I can do that.
> > > 
> > > No, I think what's there is fine - but add a test or two for that error
> > > message.
> > 
> > OK.  Understand.  We can use XFAIL for them, right?
> 
> I mean tests that PASS given the current state - for now, it's what we
> want to happen, so test that it does happen.
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> CodeSourcery
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]