This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ob] Eliminate another gdb_suppress_entire_file

On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:03:52PM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I've been using untested followed by return.  Why wouldn't that be
> > ideal?
> 
> It's actually pretty good. I think in some cases unsupported might
> be a better choice, but I like untested too, because it's always
> going to be true...
> 
> I see in your patch that you used the name of the .exp file as
> the argument of untested. Should we do that, or should we try
> to preserve the string we previously used with gdb_suppress_entire_file?

Really, I don't think it matters :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]