This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
This seems good, though less dramatic than you report. On my macppc system, it took the testsuite from 788 to 753 failures (though with a notable number of PASS->FAIL changes as well); on a AMCC 440 system, it went from 179 to 170 failures, with only one PASS->FAIL regression (which is a mysterious additional ^M in the output of "info all-registers". Summary diffs attached, and I'm trying to figure out why macppc is so much worse than the 440. (the 440 has a bunch of additional failures vs. macppc that seem related to its soft-float environment, but that's a subject for another day) - Nathan
Attachment:
macsumdiff
Description: diffs of gdb.sum on NetBSD/macppc
Attachment:
440sumdiff
Description: diffs of gdb.sum on NetBSD/evbppc (AMCC 440)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |