This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Bob Rossi <bob_rossi at cox dot net>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:52:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures
References: <20060506040741.GA14929@nevyn.them.org> <200605061657.k46GvXbh020454@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 06:57:33PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 10:02:37PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > > I can't think of exactly how the anchoring would have just anything
> > > related to these tests.  I'm just wondering, what fixed the 
> > > relative/absolute path problem?
> > 
> > My point is that before the anchoring, the "^done" pattern probably
> > matched "203^done" in the output.
> > 
> > They're still broken if you configure with a relative path, which you
> > can see from your output:
> 
> That sounds like a reasonable explanation.  I've always had to configure
> with an absolute path, or else these tests would fail.  However, since
> some time the tests fail even when configuring with an absolute path.
> The patch I'm proposing gets them back to passing in that case (with
> relative path they still fail).
> 
> Is the patch OK then?

Yes, it is.  Thanks a lot.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [PATCH] Fix spurious mi-basics.exp failures
  - From: Ulrich Weigand

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]