This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH]: Fix gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Nick Roberts <nickrob at snap dot net dot nz>
- Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem at davemloft dot net>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 16:06:07 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Fix gdb.mi/mi-regs.exp
- References: <17465.33321.414493.769813@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060409.203142.76326217.davem@davemloft.net> <17466.931.119823.103959@farnswood.snap.net.nz> <20060410.002041.124255612.davem@davemloft.net> <20060410124326.GA20298@nevyn.them.org> <17467.1710.539269.777743@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:30:22PM +1200, Nick Roberts wrote:
> I'm not sure if you're agreeing or not. I think I made the change to
> mi_cmd_data_list_register_values which broke the test for sparc. As I ran
> the testsuite on i386, I saw no failures of course.
Right. Although, from what David said, it was already broken by an
earlier (?) SPARC-specific change.
> Clearly tests which check the registers are internally consistent and
> sane for all architectures are desirable. Since no-one is offering
> to do that shall I try to write a few generic ones as suggested
> above?
If you'd like to do this, by all means, please do. For now, we can fix
up the SPARC tests, but I don't expect them to stay useful forever.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery