This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[commit] mn10300: Delete "#if 0" disabled code
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:16:11 -0700
- Subject: [commit] mn10300: Delete "#if 0" disabled code
I've just committed the patch below.
* mn10300-tdep.c (mn10300_analyze_prologue): Delete code disabled
via "#if 0".
Index: mn10300-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/mn10300-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.132
diff -u -p -r1.132 mn10300-tdep.c
--- mn10300-tdep.c 6 Sep 2005 22:01:59 -0000 1.132
+++ mn10300-tdep.c 6 Sep 2005 22:09:23 -0000
@@ -551,36 +551,6 @@ mn10300_analyze_prologue (struct frame_i
return pc;
}
-#if 0
- /* Get the next two bytes into buf, we need two because rets is a two
- byte insn and the first isn't enough to uniquely identify it. */
- if (!safe_frame_unwind_memory (fi, pc, buf, 2))
- return pc;
-
- /* Note: kevinb/2003-07-16: We shouldn't be making these sorts of
- changes to the frame in prologue examination code. */
- /* If we're physically on an "rets" instruction, then our frame has
- already been deallocated. Note this can also be true for retf
- and ret if they specify a size of zero.
-
- In this case fi->frame is bogus, we need to fix it. */
- if (fi && buf[0] == 0xf0 && buf[1] == 0xfc)
- {
- if (get_next_frame (fi) == NULL)
- deprecated_update_frame_base_hack (fi, read_sp ());
- return get_frame_pc (fi);
- }
-
- /* Similarly if we're stopped on the first insn of a prologue as our
- frame hasn't been allocated yet. */
- if (fi && get_frame_pc (fi) == func_addr)
- {
- if (get_next_frame (fi) == NULL)
- deprecated_update_frame_base_hack (fi, read_sp ());
- return get_frame_pc (fi);
- }
-#endif
-
/* NOTE: from here on, we don't want to return without jumping to
finish_prologue. */