This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: mi tty commands
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:00:18 +0300
- Subject: Re: mi tty commands
- References: <01c51b79$Blat.v2.4$4089e9a0@zahav.net.il> <20050225211911.GA21363@white> <20050225212201.GA3592@nevyn.them.org> <20050228162003.GA27783@white> <20050302025219.GA29948@white> <20050311022644.GA15563@white> <20050522210040.GB9231@white> <20050528230855.GE22435@nevyn.them.org> <uzmue8qsk.fsf@gnu.org> <20050529205435.GA11243@white> <20050601001440.GB15414@white>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:14:40 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
>
> > I'm having trouble finding a particular spot in the manual for this
> > command. Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Eli, is the MI doco good enough? or do you want the doco for set/show?
I want both ;-)
> If you want the set/show doco, please let me know where to put it in the
> manual.
Very strange: I replied to this question 2 days ago, but I cannot find
my response in the gdb-patches archives.
Here it is again. Please note the question about the "tty" command.
> Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:54:35 -0400
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
>
> I'm having trouble finding a particular spot in the manual for this
> command. Do you have any suggestions?
The node "Input/Output" seems like a perfect place.
Which reminds me: now that you introduced "set tty", doesn't that mean
we should remove the "tty" command as redundant?