This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Use HAVE_LONGLONG instead of __GNUC__ to check for longlong support.



> >
> > 2005-04-18  Manoj Iyer  <manjo@austin.ibm.com>
> >         * configure.ac: Added check for long long.
> >         * config.in: Regenerated.
> >         * configure: Regenerated.
> >         * words.h: Modified logic to check for HAVE_LONGLONG instead of
> >         __GNUC__, added config.h header file.
>
> Please use AC_CHECK_TYPES, it should take care of defining
> HAVE_LONG_LONG (note the extra underscore) and the comment all by
> itself.

So I dont need to regenerate config.in if I use AC_CHECK_TYPES? I need to
modify only configure.ac and words.h ? Wondering how HAVE_LONG_LONG will
get added to config.h in this case.

--
Manjo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]