The GDB manual isn't clear on whether thread ID's carried in the
responses to the qfThreadInfo and the qC packet may have a sign; I'm
assuming that they're just a series of hex digits.
2004-10-27 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* remote.c (remote_threads_info, remote_current_thread): Use
strtoul to parse thread ID numbers.
Index: gdb/remote.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
retrieving revision 1.134
diff -c -r1.134 remote.c
*** gdb/remote.c 26 Apr 2004 09:02:41 -0000 1.134
--- gdb/remote.c 27 Oct 2004 21:26:40 -0000
***************
*** 1755,1761 ****
putpkt ("qC");
getpkt (buf, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (buf[0] == 'Q' && buf[1] == 'C')
! return pid_to_ptid (strtol (&buf[2], NULL, 16));
else
return oldpid;
}
--- 1755,1766 ----
putpkt ("qC");
getpkt (buf, (rs->remote_packet_size), 0);
if (buf[0] == 'Q' && buf[1] == 'C')
! /* Use strtoul here, so we'll correctly parse values whose highest
! bit is set. The protocol carries them as a simple series of
! hex digits; in the absence of a sign, strtol will see such
! values as positive numbers out of range for signed 'long', and
! return LONG_MAX to indicate an overflow. */
! return pid_to_ptid (strtoul (&buf[2], NULL, 16));
else
return oldpid;
}
***************
*** 1802,1808 ****
{
do
{
! tid = strtol (bufp, &bufp, 16);
if (tid != 0 && !in_thread_list (pid_to_ptid (tid)))
add_thread (pid_to_ptid (tid));
}
--- 1807,1819 ----
{
do
{
! /* Use strtoul here, so we'll correctly parse values
! whose highest bit is set. The protocol carries
! them as a simple series of hex digits; in the
! absence of a sign, strtol will see such values as
! positive numbers out of range for signed 'long',
! and return LONG_MAX to indicate an overflow. */
! tid = strtoul (bufp, &bufp, 16);
if (tid != 0 && !in_thread_list (pid_to_ptid (tid)))
add_thread (pid_to_ptid (tid));
}