This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI handshaking
- From: "Alain Magloire" <alain at qnx dot com>
- To: cagney at gnu dot org (Andrew Cagney)
- Cc: bob at brasko dot net (Bob Rossi), alain at qnx dot com (Alain Magloire), nick at nick dot uklinux dot net (Nick Roberts), gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:44:41 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: MI handshaking
>
> (as is obvious, 6.3 is effectively out, I'm draining the queue)
>
> Bob Rossi wrote:
> > BTW, here is an example of how it looks,
> >
> > $ ../../objdir3/gdb/gdb -i=mi
> > mi_handshake={stable=mi2}
> > ~"GNU gdb 6.3.50_2004-11-04-cvs\n"
> > ~"Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.\n"
> > ~"GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are\n"
> > ~"welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.\n"
> > ~"Type \"show copying\" to see the conditions.\n"
> > ~"There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type \"show warranty\" for details.\n"
> > ~"This GDB was configured as \"i686-pc-linux-gnu\"."
> > ~"\n"
> > (gdb)
> >
> > I can obviously change the syntax of the output if it is desired.
> > There should probably be a '~' or something like that, any suggestions?
>
> Hmm, it's async (or unprompted), has the hypothetical potential for
> multiple values, and leaves us wondering which of those values it choose:
>
> *mi-handshake={version=mi2,stable=[mi2]}
>
> it should also appear after the copyright.
>
> Oh and testing ;-)
>
> Nick, Alain, comments?
>
Is it a good idea to make this an exec-async? There is really no state changes.
Printing it in the console-stream long with the
gdb version should be enough.
But if async is desired, how about a notify-async instead.
=mi-handshake,versions=[mi1,mi2,mi3],stable=[mi2]
As the doc is saying, notify-async contains supplementary information
that the client should handle.
Note: did not look at the patch.