This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [ob] Remove initializations of memset'd structure


> From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:30:06 -0500
>  > >  
>  > > -    MSYMBOL_TYPE (m) = mst_unknown;
>  > 
>  > This part of the patch seems to assume that mst_unknown has the value
>  > zero.  Should we have such assumptions in the code?
> 
> Yes, in symtab.h mst_unknown is 0.

I know that, I looked it up in symtab.h.  The question is, should the
code rely on the fact that zeroing out the struct causes the
MSYMBOL_TYPE member to become mst_unknown.  Suppose we change the
enumeration some day, that would break the code.

So I think a comment is not enough, we should leave that line alone.
In general, it is my opinion that code should not assume anything
about the numerical values of enumerated types.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]