This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: CRIS port; frame cleanup crash
- From: Orjan Friberg <orjan dot friberg at axis dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:58:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: CRIS port; frame cleanup crash
- Organization: Axis Communications
- References: <3F392591.4050409@redhat.com>
Ok, take two on trying to update the CRIS port to the new frame handling
mechanism. I'm planning to hook in the DWARF CFI frame unwinder, but I
don't know if that affects any of the other stuff I'm going to have to
do. (I'm going to have to update to the new dummy stuff later, but I
was hoping I could do that separately.)
Thanks in advance for any answers to questions, or comments on what I've
understood or misunderstood amongst all of this (or even pointers to
information I might have missed).
First of all, what does "unwind" mean in the frame context? I know it
sounds silly, but I've been trying unsuccessfully to wrap my head around
that word. Is there some fundamental thing I may have missed concerning
the new frame handling, or can I just replace "unwind" with "dig out" in
my head?
About the struct unwind_cache: looking at the other architectures, I'm
still not sure what I need in this struct. (I'm guessing stuff from the
old struct frame_extra_info should go here if still needed.) Is there a
recommended starting point for this struct? Some of the common members
between architectures' unwind caches seem to be:
prev_sp: Most comments say "The previous frame's inner most stack
address. Used as this frame ID's stack_addr." So would that be the
what the stack pointer was when the current frame was entered?
base: Is this "base" as in "base for local variables" or does it refer
to something else? Most architectures seem to set this to the frame's
frame pointer.
sp_offset and size I think I understand: how much the stack pointer has
been changed so far in the frame, and how much stack space was allocated
in this frame (absolute value of sp_offset) so far.
Thanks,
Orjan
--
Orjan Friberg
Axis Communications