This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA]: pending breakpoint support [1/3]


Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:45:55PM -0500, Jeff Johnston wrote:


Well, therein lies the problem. The word "if" might or might not be part of the symbol. The
regular logic relies on parsing out the symbol first and then looking at the aftermath. I don't have
that luxury so I punt. It may be slightly confusing if the user does the scenario above, but the
displayed pending breakpoint info is meant to be the "original breakpoint string" so I don't anticipate
the user will object too much. Ok or do you have a better idea?



Right, I see. This is fine. The patch is OK to commit with the
"resolved" wording change - thanks for your patience!



Thanks.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]