Re: PATCH (gdb/mi)

[Jim Ingham <jingham at apple dot com>]

We have added/modified some testcases, but until recently we have not 
been good about this.  Jason went through and added some about 6 months 
ago, but they are not comprehensive.   So while not good, we are not as 
bad about tests as we have been about updating the docs :-)

We have made a goodly number of MI changes, but mostly under the gun, 
and so we tended not to have the time to do the "extras".  It will take 
some work to fill in these bits before we would be able to submit our 
changes.  But they are still a useful source of ideas for other folks 
working on the MI...

Jim

On Oct 30, 2003, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> > Nick,
> > Yes, this is what our local version does for the -var-list-children 
> > command ('cept we call the variable print_value not values...), and 
> > it seems to work well.
>
> Jim, did Apple add the needed doc and testcase?
>
> Nick, MI changes need:
>
> - assignment
> - testcase
> - doco
> - patch
>
> which is more than the average patch.  This is part of trying to 
> ensure that GDB doesn't end up with un-documented un-tested MI 
> mechanisms.
>
> > Eli will probably tell you that you need to update the MI doc's.
> > Jim
--
Jim Ingham                                   jingham@apple.com
Developer Tools
Apple Computer