This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:28:41 -0500
Subject: Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"
References: <3F99901B.6030005@redhat.com> <1031024210419.ZM3102@localhost.localdomain> <3F9D3C16.2070205@redhat.com> <1031027162402.ZM29516@localhost.localdomain>

But is it a good idea, as in will it make the code easier to read, find, and understand? The old target-memory routines are all "hidden" (well i think they are :-) in gdbcore.h and corefile.c

I know it's kind of long, but how about "target-memory.[hc]" ?

I think its a bit too long (right on the edge of 8.3).

Andrew

References:
- [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [rfc] New files "memory.[hc]"
  - From: Kevin Buettner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]