This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Oct 27, 1:45pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Index: solib-svr4.c
...
+#include "bfd-target.h" +#include "exec.h"
I'm surprised that you needed to include exec.h. solib-svr4.c already includes target.h and I would've thought this to be sufficient. If exec.h isn't needed, please take it out. (Don't forget to fix Makefile.in.)
+/* Given an executable's ABFD and target, compute the entry-point + address. */ + +static CORE_ADDR +exec_entry_point (struct bfd *abfd, struct target_ops *targ) +{
Could you add a comment here telling why gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr() is needed. Maybe something like this?
/* For most targets, the address returned by bfd_get_start_address() is the entry point for the start function. But, for some targets, bfd_get_start_address() returns the address of a function descriptor from which the entry point address may be extracted. This address is extracted by gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr(). The method gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr() is the merely the identify function for targets which don't use function descriptors. */
Hmm, a possible problem... What happens when the target uses function descriptors, but not for the exec file's start address? I'm wondering (ugh) if a separate gdbarch method is required for obtaining the start address.
+ return gdbarch_convert_from_func_ptr_addr (current_gdbarch, + bfd_get_start_address (abfd), + targ); +}
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |