This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] New testcase for PR:1291
Kris Warkentin writes:
> > > A) move it and make it generic.
> > > B) leave it and write it in assembly.
> >
> > I like (B) better. The backtrace code is all about specific
> > assembly instructions. So I'd like it better in the style of the i386
> > prologue tests, with explicit assembly.
> >
> > Michael C
>
> Okay so this bit of assembly adequately demonstrates the problem. There is
> a bit of an issue here though that perhaps some sh4 expert can clear up for
> me. If I run this and go "until sub2", it stops on sub2 and works fine.
> If, however, I go "until sub1", followed by "until sub2", it stops a couple
> instructions before sub2 and I have to 'si' into it. I can modify the test
> case to not bother checking sub1 (since we know it's okay anyway) but I'm
> still puzzled as to why this is having the problem.
>
> cheers,
>
> Kris
>
Ok. Not sure why that happens. It defeinitely seems like a bug. File
a pr, and KFAIL it in the testsuite, with the pr number.
elena
>
> void sub1 (void);
> void sub2 (void);
>
> main()
> {
> sub1();
> sub2();
> }
>
> asm(".text\n"
> " .align 5\n"
> "sub1:\n"
> " mov.l r14,@-r15\n"
> " add #-128,r15\n"
> " add #-128,r15\n"
> " mov r15,r14\n"
> " mov.w .STACK1,r7\n"
> " add r7,r14\n"
> " mov r14,r15\n"
> " mov.l @r15+,r14\n"
> " rts\n"
> " nop\n"
> " .align 1\n"
> ".STACK1:\n"
> " .short 256\n");
>
> asm(".text\n"
> " .align 5\n"
> "sub2:\n"
> " mov.l r14,@-r15\n"
> " mov.w .STACK2,r3\n"
> " sub r3,r15\n"
> " mov r15,r14\n"
> " mov.w .STACK2,r7\n"
> " add r7,r14\n"
> " mov r14,r15\n"
> " mov.l @r15+,r14\n"
> " rts\n"
> " nop\n"
> " .align 1\n"
> ".STACK2:\n"
> " .short 260\n");
>
>