This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
- From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
- To: carlton at kealia dot com
- Cc: jimb at redhat dot com, ac131313 at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
- References: <vt2n0buw7r5.fsf@zenia.home> <3F96D128.5040904@redhat.com><vt23cdlvy21 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <3F970598 dot 9020908 at redhat dot com><vt2k76wvp68 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <yf28yncg8dx.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:28:10 -0700
On 22 Oct 2003 18:16:31 -0500, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> said:
> But I think it's easier to see what the *resulting code* does with
> the function in place. We should put the readability of the
> resultant code above readability of the change. You say, "A can use
> a handler for B if A can run code for B", and then you can make a
> separate check to see whether can_run_code_for is correct.
I very much agree with this.
Being the person who got the test wrong in the first place I say:
Definitely!
Mark