This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: RFA - PATCH - Support H8/300H and H8S Normal Mode for GDB
- From: "Shrinivas Atre" <ShrinivasA at KPITCummins dot com>
- To: <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: <nickc at redhat dot com>,"Michael Snyder" <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 18:21:33 +0530
- Subject: RE: RFA - PATCH - Support H8/300H and H8S Normal Mode for GDB
Hi,
Committed with changes suggested.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-cvs/2003-10/msg00144.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-cvs/2003-10/msg00145.html
Regards,
Shrinivas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 2:54 AM
> To: Shrinivas Atre
> Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com; nickc@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: RFA - PATCH - Support H8/300H and H8S Normal Mode for GDB
>
>
> Shrinivas Atre wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch enables debugging and simulation of
> H8/300H and H8S
> > Normal Mode binaries in GDB.
> >
> > Is that OK for mainline and 6.0 branch ?
> >
> > The patches are attached as well as included inline.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shrinivas
>
> Hi Shrinivas,
>
> I'm sorry for the delay. Yes, these are fine -- except that I can't
> approve the BFD part. Please submit that separately to
> binutils@sources.redhat.com, it should be approved as a matter
> of course. Then you can check everything in -- and thanks.
>
> Michael
>
> Oops, I forgot to add -- I would prefer the idiom "!h8300_normal_mode"
> instead of "0 == h8300_normal_mode", especially when it's not
> by itself
> but part of an expression.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
>
> Err... and I meant to approve the updated version of your patch,
> including the changes made in response to Corinna's suggestions.
> ;-/