Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]

[Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > On the infrastructure side we will be able to have an "impl_breakpoint"
> >
> > > > (short for implementation; better naming ideas?) for each location 
> > > we are
> > > > watching using hardware watchpoints.  This will simplify a lot of 
> > > code.  It
> > > > will also eventually become easier to object-orient our breakpoints.
> >
> >
> > > How about "user breakpoints" and "machine breakpoints"?
> >
> >
> >
> > I like it.
>
>
> Daniel, did you mention somewhere that the debugger book used "logical" 
> and "physical" breakpoint?  If it does, it might be better to adopt its 
> terminology here.

We should think of what would be most meaningful to the user --
not to us.  What would "machine breakpoint" mean to a user?