This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:52:36 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <vt27k3ffvv5.fsf@zenia.home> <20031008190502.GA13579@nevyn.them.org>

On the infrastructure side we will be able to have an "impl_breakpoint"
> (short for implementation; better naming ideas?) for each location we are
> watching using hardware watchpoints.  This will simplify a lot of code.  It
> will also eventually become easier to object-orient our breakpoints.
How about "user breakpoints" and "machine breakpoints"?

I like it.

Daniel, did you mention somewhere that the debugger book used "logical" and "physical" breakpoint? If it does, it might be better to adopt its terminology here.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Michael Snyder

References:
- RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]