This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>,Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 15:04:09 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
References: <20031008165534.GA8718@nevyn.them.org> <16260.19698.165606.470200@localhost.redhat.com>

This is certainly the right direction. We have discussed this in very
general terms (I believe at the gcc conference), but I don't remember
a discussion on the gdb lists. Since this seems quite a big rewrite (I
am not sure, I just saw all this stuff appearing at once), how about
using the branching approach? It has worked well for a few features now.

Honestly, yes. As core maintainers we should be willing to do as we ask.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFA: Breakpoint infrastructure cleanups [0/8]
  - From: Elena Zannoni

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]