Re: [RFC] TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS - patch 1 of 4

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

>    Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:28:13 -0700
>    From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
>    The patch below should be non-controversial.  It merely adds the
>    TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS method.  Code which uses it (the
>    possibly controversial bit) will come in patch #3.  Documentation will
>    be in the next patch, #2.  Finally, target specific code which
>    requires TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS will be posted in patch #4.
>
> Do we really need the "TARGET" in the name of the new method?  It made
> me think that this was something that was going to be added to the
> target-vector instead of the architecture vector.

Good point (making note that the term 'target architecture' really 
doesn't make sense).

Andrew