This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>, Mark Kettenis <m dot kettenis at osp dot nl>, Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Scott Bambrough <scottb at netwinder dot org>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 08:19:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] add-symbol-file-from-memory command
- References: <16253.63603.893757.250193@localhost.redhat.com><200310032300.h93N06sS021135@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Roland McGrath writes:
> > The reason being that there was no agreement on the prerequisites,
> > i.e. how to "do it right". There was no decision yet from the kernel
> > people either.
>
> As I said in my later posting last night, this has now been resolved in
> Linux 2.6 (the way we wanted it).
Yes.
I was more referring to the binutils mail thread starting at:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00658.html which had
a rework of your function but was never finished, after several
comments. I.e. the interface/signature for that function is still in
flux.