Re: [testsuite] add gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> ac> I also intend again proposing that existing XFAILS get yanked.
> dc> That sounds okay to me.
>
> Mmmm, I would like to dig down a level, rather than just blow
> away setup_xfail calls.
>
> First I would like to decide which hp configurations and which
> *compilers* we support, do some test runs on them, and weed out stuff
> that we don't need.  That would help out a lot.  Similarly for Sun.

Per the discussion last time, I think its far cleaner and more efficient 
use of our resources to just cut our losses and yank the lot.

> Also I don't want to pay much attention to this until gdb 6.0
> is out the door.

We'll all agree to that one :-)

> dc> There are a few XFAILS which have a bug number associated with them
> dc> that's around 2400 or so: these are especially urgent, because it won't
> dc> be all _that_ long before the bug number might start looking like a GDB
> dc> bug number.

They should definitly be yanked, they are meaningless.

Andrew