This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dave Brolley wrote:
Michael Snyder wrote:
Dave Brolley wrote:
Michael, please revert this change. This test uses several different notations to reference the lcr register and one of them is 'lcr'. As you can see spr[273] is tested a few lines later.
Yeah, but 'lcr' had already been tested (twice) above. If I revert it, then the exact same line, movgs gr8, lcr is tested twice, while movgs gr8, spr[273] is not tested at all.
OK. Now that I look at the entire test case, I see that this patch is correct.
Of course, you could argue that we need to make sure that lcr is identical with spr[273]. Would you like me to add a third clause in which we store to lcr and retrieve from spr[273]?
Thanks, Dave
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |