This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 03:20:44PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >Groumf! Our nightly regression test showed a small regression
> >which does not appear on my machine. We have an all-Ada program which
> >defines a function named Func1, and here is what the test does:
> >
> > (gdb) break *Func1'Address
> > (gdb) run
>
> I've been wondering if this language stuff was going to interact badly
> with breakpoints. Anyway, is it possible to create an equivalent gcj
> test case since gcj is likely more accessable to developers?
I think this is going to become an increasingly prominent problem.
You can create testcases for this in C++, if your system starts C++
programs up in startup code which is auto(asm) instead of c++. I think
it's as simple as:
(gdb) break classname::func
And we won't correctly load the class. This happens on Solaris, not
sure about GNU/Linux.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer