This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:57:57PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
- delete the SP_REGNUM hack from the REG_UNDEFINED rule (it's no longer needed, I think)
Leaving the hack in REG_UNSPECIFIED? Yes, I'm pretty sure you're right.
- add a check/complaint for the SP v CFA problem.
Could you hold off on the complaint until there's a valid way to specify the SP in the unwind information? Right now there isn't one, as I described on the dwarf2 list three weeks ago.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
@@ -611,7 +646,9 @@
switch (cache->reg[regnum].how)
{
- case REG_UNSAVED:
+ case REG_UNDEFINED:
+ /* If CFI explicitly specified that the value isn't defined,
+ mark it as optomized away - the value isn't available. */
"optimized"
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |