This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: Powerpc and software single step
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Jimi Xenidis <jimix at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:20:05 -0400
- Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: Powerpc and software single step
- References: <3F4398EC.2050405@redhat.com> <16195.39851.78762.619597@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F4440F0.30007@redhat.com> <16198.6133.411978.563514@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F463CA9.5000900@redhat.com> <16198.21410.308896.588372@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <3F465EFD.9020700@redhat.com> <16220.53590.956496.102996@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> <20030908190016.GB24747@nevyn.them.org> <16220.58287.637563.556990@kitch0.watson.ibm.com>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:16:47PM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >>>>> "DJ" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>
> DJ> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >> >>>>> "AC" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> AC> What about a patch to eliminate the macros? Good incremental step.
> >>
> >> Your wish is my (very much delayed) command ;-)
>
> DJ> Eh, no. This patch would turn on software single-step for GNU/Linux
>
> This patch simply removes the macro definitions. It does _not_ turn
> on software single step for GNU/Linux since the macro tests for the
> gdbarch vector which is NULL because it is undefined, but it is
> defined for AIX.
>
> I have verified this by both watching it with gdb and with strace
> output.
Are you sure you posted the patch you tested?
You added a call to set_gdbarch_software_single_step to
rs6000_gdbarch_init. It wasn't conditional on anything relating to
AIX. By all rights that _should_ set gdbarch_software_singlestep_p for
GNU/Linux.
>
> DJ> also I doubt that's what you wanted to do.
>
> You are right in that it is not what I wanted when this whole thing
> started, but it was suggested that I remove the macro before I propose
> the ability to select SW over HW at runtime.
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer