This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc] Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 12:44:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch rfc, 6.0?] only allow raw raw registers; Was: [patch rfc] Add NUM_REGS pseudo regs to MIPS
- References: <200307271855.h6RItIho043770@oberon.asicdesigners.com> <3F2442B3.1000506@redhat.com> <3F254328.2030407@redhat.com> <20030728163857.GA28595@nevyn.them.org> <20030818170933.GA26128@nevyn.them.org> <3F41100F.1080706@redhat.com>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:42:39PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> What does "maint print [raw-]registers" look like?
>
> >(gdb) i all-registers
> > zero at v0 v1 a0 a1 a2
> > a3
> > R0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000
> > t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6
> > t7
> > R8 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> > 00000000
> > s0 s1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s6
> > s7
> > R16 7fff7eaf 7fff7dcc 7fff7dd4 00000003 004059cc 10012808 00000000
> > 00000000
> > t8 t9 k0 k1 gp sp s8
> > ra
> > R24 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 7fff7df0 00000000
> > 00000000
> > zero at v0 v1 a0 a1
> > 00000000 0067194b 00000004 80279720 00000020 2aac0ac0
> > a2: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > a3: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> > t0: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > t1: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> > t2: 0xffffffff flt: nan dbl: nan
> > t3: 0xffffffff flt: nan
> >
> >
> >Obviously the registers aren't where it expects them to be.
Thanks for the pointer, and sorry for the noise. The problem was a
local patch which added MIPS_REGISTER_NAMES for GNU/Linux; it recently
changed to start at 32 and I still had the first 32 registers listed.
After 6.0 I'll try to flush my MIPS queue.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer