This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] more gdb.c++/templates.exp failures
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Date: 03 Mar 2003 17:01:52 -0800
- Subject: Re: [patch] more gdb.c++/templates.exp failures
- References: <ro11y1ogje1.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On 03 Mar 2003 14:44:38 -0800, David Carlton <carlton at math dot Stanford dot EDU> said:
> "destructor breakpoint" triggers gdb/1112. I changed this from
> gdb_test into send_gdb/gdb_expect instead of gdb_test_multiple. I
> realize this makes me a bad person; one of these days I'll play around
> with gdb_test_multiple, honest I will.
Daniel's given me enough hand-holding so that I'll use
gdb_test_multiple (which, after all, really is easier to use than
send_gdb/gdb_expect); new version of the patch is below.
David Carlton
carlton at math dot stanford dot edu
2003-03-03 David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
* gdb.c++/templates.exp (do_tests): Accept valid const in "print
Garply<Garply<char> >:: garply".
(test_ptype_of_templates): KFAIL "ptype T5<int>" and "ptype t5i"
with respect to PR c++/1111; note also PR c++/1113.
(test_template_breakpoints): KFAIL "constructor breakpoint" with
respect to PR c++/1062.
KFAIL "destructor breakpoint" with respect to PR c++/1112.
Index: templates.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/templates.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.17 templates.exp
--- templates.exp 3 Mar 2003 18:39:47 -0000 1.17
+++ templates.exp 4 Mar 2003 01:00:11 -0000
@@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ proc test_ptype_of_templates {} {
-re "type = class T5<int> \{${ws}public:${ws}static int X;${ws}int x;${ws}int val;((${ws}T5<int> & operator=\\(T5<int> const ?&\\);)|(${ws}T5\\(int\\);)|(${ws}T5\\((T5<int> const|const T5<int>) ?&\\);)|(${ws}~T5\\((void|)\\);)|(${ws}static void \\* operator new\\(unsigned( int| long)?\\);)|(${ws}static void operator delete\\(void ?\\*\\);)|(${ws}int value\\((void|)\\);))*${ws}\}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "ptype T5<int> (obsolescent gcc or gdb)"
}
+ -re "type = class T5<int> \{${ws}public:${ws}static int X;${ws}int x;${ws}int val;${ws}void T5\\(int\\);${ws}void T5\\((T5<int> const|const T5<int>) ?&\\);${ws}~T5\\(int\\);${ws}static void \\* operator new\\(unsigned\\);${ws}static void operator delete\\(void ?\\*\\);${ws}int value\\((void|)\\);${ws}\}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # This also triggers gdb/1113...
+ kfail "gdb/1111" "ptype T5<int>"
+ }
-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
fail "ptype T5<int>"
}
@@ -83,6 +87,10 @@ proc test_ptype_of_templates {} {
-re "type = class T5<int> \{${ws}public:${ws}static int X;${ws}int x;${ws}int val;((${ws}T5<int> & operator=\\(T5<int> const ?&\\);)|(${ws}T5\\(int\\);)|(${ws}T5\\(T5<int> const ?&\\);)|(${ws}~T5\\((void|)\\);)|(${ws}static void \\* operator new\\(unsigned( int| long)?\\);)|(${ws}static void operator delete\\(void ?\\*\\);)|(${ws}int value\\((void|)\\);))*${ws}\}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "ptype t5i (obsolescent gcc or gdb)"
}
+ -re "type = class T5<int> \{${ws}public:${ws}static int X;${ws}int x;${ws}int val;${ws}void T5\\(int\\);${ws}void T5\\((T5<int> const|const T5<int>) ?&\\);${ws}~T5\\(int\\);${ws}static void \\* operator new\\(unsigned\\);${ws}static void operator delete\\(void ?\\*\\);${ws}int value\\((void|)\\);${ws}\}\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+ # This also triggers gdb/1113...
+ kfail "gdb/1111" "ptype T5<int>"
+ }
-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
fail "ptype t5i"
}
@@ -114,6 +122,12 @@ proc test_template_breakpoints {} {
"canceled" \
"constructor breakpoint"
}
+ -re "0. cancel.*\[\r\n\]*.1. all.*\[\r\n\]*.2. T5 at .*\[\r\n\]*.3. T5 at .*\[\r\n\]*> $" {
+ setup_kfail "gdb/1062" "*-*-*"
+ gdb_test "0" \
+ "nonsense intended to insure that this test fails" \
+ "constructor breakpoint"
+ }
-re ".*\n> $" {
gdb_test "0" \
"nonsense intended to insure that this test fails" \
@@ -125,9 +139,17 @@ proc test_template_breakpoints {} {
# See CLLbs14792
if {$hp_aCC_compiler} {setup_xfail hppa*-*-* CLLbs14792}
- gdb_test "break T5<int>::~T5" \
- "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*${testfile}.cc, line.*" \
- "destructor breakpoint"
+
+ gdb_test_multiple "break T5<int>::~T5" "destructor_breakpoint" {
+ -re "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*${testfile}.cc, line.*$gdb_prompt $"
+ {
+ pass "destructor breakpoint"
+ }
+ -re "the class `T5<int>' does not have destructor defined\r\nHint: try 'T5<int>::~T5<TAB> or 'T5<int>::~T5<ESC-\\?>\r\n\\(Note leading single quote.\\)\r\n$gdb_prompt $"
+ {
+ kfail "gdb/1112" "destructor breakpoint"
+ }
+ }
gdb_test "break T5<int>::value" \
"Breakpoint.*at.* file .*${testfile}.cc, line.*" \
@@ -479,7 +501,7 @@ gdb_expect {
send_gdb "print Garply<Garply<char> >::garply\n"
gdb_expect {
- -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = \\{(class |)Garply<char> \\((class |)Garply<Garply<char> > \\*, int, (class |)Garply<char>\\)\\} $hex <Garply<Garply<char>\[ \t\]*>::garply\\(int, (class |)Garply<char>\\)>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { pass "print Garply<Garply<char> >::garply" }
+ -re "\\$\[0-9\]* = \\{(class |)Garply<char> \\((class |)Garply<Garply<char> > \\*(| const), int, (class |)Garply<char>\\)\\} $hex <Garply<Garply<char>\[ \t\]*>::garply\\(int, (class |)Garply<char>\\)>\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { pass "print Garply<Garply<char> >::garply" }
-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { fail "print Garply<Garply<char> >::garply" }
timeout { fail "print Garply<Garply<char> >::garply (timeout)" }
}