This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches(in 5.3 branch?)]]

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>
Cc: msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,drow at mvista dot com
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:40:24 -0500
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches(in 5.3 branch?)]]
References: <3DE3F135.6030605@redhat.com> <3DE53144.3020502@redhat.com> <200211301613.gAUGDInq000267@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>

Is there any chance that the attached could be reviewed over the next few hours?

Apparently not :-(. Anyway, I've looked at it now and it appears that
GDB as it stands now isn't ready to cope with the abstraction of the
lin-lwp layer as I intended it. So I guess that until we overhaul the
way GDB deals with threads, Daniels patch (sans the #ifdef) is the way
to go.

(The US has holidays round this time?)

Thanks!  I'll merge it in, test it and then start the 5.2.91 process.

Andrew

References:
- [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches(in 5.3 branch?)]]
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches(in 5.3 branch?)]]
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: gdb/725: Crash using debug target and regcaches(in 5.3 branch?)]]
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]