Re: [RFA] doc/Makefile.in install

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > 
 > > I think, at some point in the distant past, it was controversial
 > > whether packages should install their info files by default.  I think
 > > that was back when disks were much smaller than they are now.
 > > Nowadays most packages install their info by default, so there's no
 > > reason for GDB not to do so as well.
 > 
 > So that's the reason!   I knew there was one but couldn't remember what 
 > it was.
 > 
 > Elena, also note:
 > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=723
 > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=245
 > http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_55.html#SEC55
 > 
 > Andrew
 > 

Argh. There is way more than what meets the eye. Ok, I'll look into
this a bit more.

Elena