This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I've added some tests to gdb.c++/m-static that correspond to the patch in <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00385.html>; patches below. A few tangential questions: * I hope I got the stuff in brackets in the subject correct; is rfa "request for approval"? * What's the convention for submitting new files (as opposed to patches to existing files)? (I'd look through the mail archive for examples, but I don't seem to be able to access it right now.) I'm attaching them below as files and hoping that the mailer will make it clear what they're named and so forth; please let me know if I should do anything else. * CONTRIBUTE suggests using "cvs diff -cp", but everybody submits unidiff patches. Should I change it to say "cvs diff -up"? * Does "make clean" actually clean up the testsuite directory properly? Looking at the Makefile in gdb.c++, it seems like it cleans up whatever's in the EXECUTABLES variable, which certainly doesn't include all the executables in that directory. Is there something else magic going on, or should I audit the Makefile.in's in the various directories to see if they clean up everything? (Yes, I know, I should really type "make clean" and see what it does, but I don't feel like rebuilding gdb if somebody can answer the question quickly.) Thanks, David Carlton carlton@math.stanford.edu 2002-08-16 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu> * gdb.c++/m-static.exp: Added test 4. * gdb.c++/m-static.cc: Ditto. * gdb.c++/m-static.h: New file. * gdb.c++/m-static1.cc: New file.
Index: m-static.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 m-static.exp
--- m-static.exp 30 May 2002 19:09:47 -0000 1.1
+++ m-static.exp 16 Aug 2002 20:59:29 -0000
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
# Tests for member static data
# 2002-05-13 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
+# 2002-08-16 David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
# This file is part of the gdb testsuite
@@ -33,9 +34,10 @@ set bug_id 0
set testfile "m-static"
set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
+set srcfile1 ${testfile}1.cc
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
-if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
+if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile} ${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile1}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}
@@ -55,8 +57,8 @@ if ![runto_main] then {
}
# One.
-gdb_test "break 68" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 68\\."
-gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:68\r\n.*" "continue to 68"
+gdb_test "break 72" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 72\\."
+gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:72\r\n.*" "continue to 72"
# simple object, static const bool
gdb_test "print test1.test" "\\$\[0-9\]* = true" "simple object, static const bool"
@@ -71,8 +73,8 @@ gdb_test "print test1.key2" "\\$\[0-9\]*
gdb_test "print test1.value" "\\$\[0-9\]* = oriental" "simple object, static enum"
# Two.
-gdb_test "break 69" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 69\\."
-gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:69\r\n.*" "continue to 69"
+gdb_test "break 73" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 73\\."
+gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:73\r\n.*" "continue to 73"
# derived template object, base static const bool
gdb_test "print test2.test" "\\$\[0-9\]* = true" "derived template object, base static const bool"
@@ -90,8 +92,11 @@ gdb_test "print test2.value" "\\$\[0-9\]
gdb_test "print test2.value_derived" "\\$\[0-9\].* = etruscan" "derived template object, static enum"
# Three.
-gdb_test "break 71" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 71\\."
-gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:71\r\n.*" "continue to 71"
+
+# Setting a breakpoint at the test4 initializer doesn't work, since
+# execution won't stop there.
+gdb_test "break 76" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]*.*line 76\\."
+gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*at.*m-static\\.cc:76\r\n.*" "continue to 76"
# template object, static derived template data member's base static const bool
gdb_test "print test3.data.test" "\\$\[0-9\].* = true" "template object, static const bool"
@@ -107,6 +112,22 @@ gdb_test "print test3.data.value" "\\$\[
# template object, static derived template data member's static enum
gdb_test "print test3.data.value_derived" "\\$\[0-9\].* = etruscan" "template object, static derived enum"
+
+# 2002-08-16
+# Four.
+
+# No breakpoint: see test3 comment.
+
+# static const int initialized in another file.
+gdb_test "print test4.elsewhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 221" "static const int initialized elsewhere"
+
+# static const int that nobody initializes. From PR gdb/635.
+gdb_test "print test4.nowhere" "field nowhere is nonexistent or has been optimised out" "static const int initialized nowhere"
+
+# Perhaps at some point test4 should also include a test for a static
+# const int that was initialized in the header file. But I'm not sure
+# that GDB's current behavior in such situations is either consistent
+# across platforms or optimal, so I'm not including one now.
gdb_exit
return 0
Index: m-static.cc
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/m-static.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 m-static.cc
--- m-static.cc 30 May 2002 19:09:47 -0000 1.1
+++ m-static.cc 16 Aug 2002 20:59:25 -0000
@@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ namespace __gnu_test
template<typename T>
gnu_obj_2<int> gnu_obj_3<T>::data(etruscan);
+
+ // 2002-08-16
+ // Test four.
+#include "m-static.h"
}
// instantiate templates explicitly so their static members will exist
@@ -67,6 +71,7 @@ int main()
gnu_obj_1 test1(egyptian, 4589);
gnu_obj_2<long> test2(roman);
gnu_obj_3<long> test3(greek);
+ gnu_obj_4 test4;
return 0;
}
Attachment:
m-static.h
Description: m-static.h
Attachment:
m-static1.cc
Description: m-static1.cc
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |