This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc


Andrew Cagney writes:
 > > 
 > > Great.
 > > 
 > > 
 > >> Is there a bug report for this?
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Other than the one that came with the patch posted to this mailing
 > > list?  I don't think so?  Should I create one, install the patch and
 > > then close it?
 > 
 > I counted 4 or 5!  You should look at gdb/390, there may still be 
 > ``issues''.

There is also 294 (which is essentially a duplicate of 390).  Alex,
can you take a look? Maybe your configury test needs to be made a bit
more sophisticated.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?database=gdb

Elena


 > 
 >  > I'm not aware of such GDB policies :-(
 > 
 > I think people doing this are viewed in a positive light (however there 
 > isn't any strict requirement :-).
 > 
 > The rewritten web page reads:
 > 
 > > GDB has a Bug Database. It is used to track bugs (Problem Reports or PRs) and enhancements (Change Requests or CRs). In addition to problems encountered when running GDB, bugs include: errors or missing documentation; missing test cases; web changes; work in progress; dummy reports for fixed but unreported bugs; entries of not-a-bugs; and even adminstrivia.
 > 
 > Andrew
 > 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]