This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa] Always define all of TARGET_SIGNAL_*

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 12:17:40PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>I've been meaning to fix this since I noticed it last summer.  These 
> >>>numbers
> >>>are part of the remote protocol.  While I think the last ones are never 
> >>>sent
> >>>over the wire, they could be (with the exception of TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST 
> >>>which
> >>>is -not- part of the protocol, as I understand it).  Having them jump 
> >>>around
> >>>is bad.
> >
> >>
> >>Wasn't this enum going to be moved to signals.h?
> >
> >
> >I think so, but I didn't see any pressing reason to.  If you want, I
> >can do that.
> >
> >OK otherwise?
> I'd leave it until after things branch and then fix it properly in the 
> trunk.

I don't really see a point in fixing this nit in the remote protocol
next release rather than this one, but if you prefer I'll wait.

Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]