This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes

On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 10:16:56AM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <> writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:39:34PM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm with you on VALUE_OFFSET and VALUE_EMBEDDED_OFFSET.  I'm pretty
> > > sure VALUE_OFFSET can be eliminated from GDB entirely, with some minor
> > > changes to the representation of subvalues of registers and
> > > convenience variables.
> > 
> > I am exceedingly tempted to do this.
> Yeah, wouldn't it be nice if VALUE_ADDRESS returned, oh, say, the
> value's address?  For register and convenience variable subvalues, use
> the value's address field instead of the offset field.  I'm pretty
> sure VALUE_OFFSET goes away entirely then.

If I get a little spare time, or adequately frustrated with vtables,
I'm going to try for this.

Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]