This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: symtab.c change breaks assembly lang debugging
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:03:14PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:15:07PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > > Jim,
> > >
> > > I presume the change below was meant as an optimization, but it's
> > > based on a false assumption -- that you can't have line numbers
> > > if you don't have block symbols. That premise is untrue if you
> > > are debugging assembly language source, where the assembler emits
> > > line syms but not block syms. This change breaks the test case
> > > for assembly source debugging, gdb.asm/asm-source.exp.
> > >
> > > You would not have noticed, because that test only works on a few
> > > targets right now (d10v being one of them).
> > >
> > > Patch from Peter Schauer:
> > >
> > > * symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): If we can't find the function
> > > containing PC, we certainly won't have line number information for
> > > that location, so return zero immediately.
> > <sigh>
> > OK, I should have thought of that. The problem is that this almost
> > always indicates a lack of debugging information, and GDB historically
> > copes very badly with not having any debugging information available.
> > Aside from Jim's address range cleanups, which are certainly a good
> > solution for the cases they can handle, I don't know what to do about
> > this.
> What need are you trying to address? Is it, as I surmised, an optimization?
> And if so, can we take it out until we think of a better way to do it?
No, it isn't an optimization. It was meant to be a sanity check.
In the presence of stabs, and multiple code sections, the address
ranges for a symtab become invalid. Suppose that you have libstdc++
with stabs, and a program with no debug info. Suppose you try to
breakpoint at main. Libstdc++'s objects have a start address before
main, because it is linked first, but the code is not in that location.
It's up in the linkonce sections, after main, because *(.text) is first
in the linker script.
We call find_pc_sect_line, and it tells us that the "line" for main is
in libstdc++. So the breakpoint gets set at the beginning of that
"line" - in libstdc++! Not useful.
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer