This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Jeff Holcomb <jeffh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 15:54:16 -0500
- Subject: Re: [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- References: <Pine.SOL.email@example.com>
>> Is there a reason for pulling in GCC's hacks rather than going to the
>> official version per src/MAINTAINERS:
>> ltconfig; ltmain.sh
>> libtool: http://gnu.org
>> Changes need to be done in tandem with the official LIBTOOL
>> sources or submitted to the master file maintainer and brought
>> in via a merge.
> It was my impression from Alexandre that he had already imported these
> changes from the official sources into gcc's tree. For some reason, they
> weren't imported into the binutils/gdb tree at that time.
Ok, so now that the change is committed to the master repository, it can
be committed locally. Can the ``gcc-local'' bit be clarified - it is no
longer gcc-local. Rather it was an accelerated patch brought in from
the master repository.