This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] New tests for 'const' and 'volatile' expressions
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > Michael Snyder wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a test that I forgot to submit back in September,
> > > after submitting the changes to the expression parser that
> > > permitted more complex expressions involving const and volatile.
> > Nice, new tests are good!
> > > I've tested the test on several native and embedded targets.
> > >
> > Do they pass?
> Oh, yes -- no failures, when tested on the main branch.
> I have not tested the 5.1 branch. If it fails, there would
> be two choices:
> * merge the parser patch onto the branch
> * omit this test from the branch.
As this is a new feature, it would not make much sense have it
where the feature was not yet added, right?
So I would say it goes where you previous patch goes, and only there.
I guess you can check it in to the trunk now.
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9