This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
- To: ac131313 at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: gdbserver/{<foo>,<os>,<bar>}.c?; Was: [rfa] gdbserver overhaul
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:29:04 +0200
- CC: drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1011018101039.26141H-100000@is> <3BCEFBF4.3000508@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:57:40 -0400
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> >
> >> or if it did it couldn't use any of these low-* files right?
> >
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand this. How is the DJGPP port different from
> > any other port in this respect?
>
> I don't think DJGPP's low/nat interface looks like UNIX's ptrace() or
> /procfs so much of the existing low-* code wouldn't be used.
That's true, but the low-* files are supposed to be compiled on the
target system, not on the host, right? If so, all but one of these
low-* files is irrelevant for other platforms as well, right?