This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] enum enable
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 11:54:42 +0300 (IDT)
- cc: msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, ac131313 at cygnus dot com
On 31 Jul 2001, Jim Blandy wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> > I attach below, after the error messages, the part of patch for
> > printcmd.c, which clearly shows that _all_ of the lines for which GCC
> > complained on your machine should in fact have been patched by the
> > patch I posted. How come it didn't work for you?
>
> That part of the patch doesn't appear in your most recent post:
Right, I inadvertently deleted it when posting the augmented patch.
Sorry.
> I suspect your first patch had a similar problem, too.
No, that one did have the patches for printcmd.c. See
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-07/msg00339.html