This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: patch: disassembly look
Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi David,
> This is really cool. I am not sure who the maintainer is but I guess
> he/she will approve (I hope).
Well Fernando, you're partially on the hook. This is to do with the
command line :-)
> But *please*, make the default to plain asm, will you? This will make
> sure that the GUIs that still use console output won't break (who knows
> how many are still out there).
> Also, you should consider adding a patch to the manual as well. This is
> a cool feature and if you include it in there I am certain there will be
> very grateful users of you changes pretty soon :-)
In terms of a change. Yes, DDD et.al. would (unfortunatly) freak out if
presented with this change as it currently stands. It should default to
the old style.
At a more technical level, what happens if the patch as it stands,
encounters re-ordered (randomly ordered) instructions. Does (should?)
your code print a source line multiple times in that case? Have a look
at how GDB/MI and GDBtk handled that problem (ok so you can't see gdbmi