This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Move alloca(0) to wait_for_inferior() from registers_changed()
- To: Nick Duffek <nsd at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Move alloca(0) to wait_for_inferior() from registers_changed()
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:23:59 +1100
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, cagney at redhat dot com
- References: <200011131737.eADHbdJ16788@rtl.cygnus.com> <200012132242.eBDMg3F02014@rtl.cygnus.com>
Nick Duffek wrote:
>
> On 13-Nov-2000, Nick Duffek wrote:
>
> >The appended patch moves an alloca (0) call from
> >registers_changed() in regcache.c to wait_for_inferior() in infrun.c.
>
> I haven't received a yea or nay on this yet. Andrew, are you the person
> to [dis]approve this, since neither regcache.c nor infrun.c is mentioned
> in MAINTAINERS?
>
> I've augmented the comment in infrun.c a bit; modified patch is appended.
> No regressions on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Shouldn't such a thing be part of the event loop (or very close to it?).
Andrew