This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH RFC] Protoize tui/*.c
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Protoize tui/*.c
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:55:25 -0700
- References: <1001116010703.ZM16390@ocotillo.lan>
On Nov 15, 6:07pm, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> The patches below were generated automatically and "protoize" the C
> source files in tui. If you glance at the patches, you'll notice that
> these sources were already protoized and that only the old K&R style
> declarations were removed along with the corresponding __STDC__
> ifdefs. (The remaining, already protized, function declarators are
> reformatted too where appropriate.) I will post the script used to do
> the conversion as a reply to this message.
>
> Since this set of patches is rather large, I'll wait at least a week
> for comments before committing it. I.e, I'll commit this patch
> sometime after Wed, November 22.
>
> * tui.c, tuiCommand.c, tuiData.c, tuiDataWin.c, tuiDisassem.c,
> tuiGeneralWin.c, tuiIO.c, tuiLayout.c, tuiRegs.c, tuiSource.c,
> tuiSourceWin.c, tuiStack.c, tuiWin.c: Remove K&R style function
> declarators and corresponding ifdefs leaving only the ISO-C
> style function declarator.
FYI, the above changes have *not* been committed yet. It was suggested
(semi-)privately to me that it would be best to wait for the maintainer(s)
of these files to give their approval. I have attempted to contact the
maintainer privately, but have had no response.
What are the procedures that we should follow if a maintainer appears
to be MIA?
Kevin