This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[PATCH RFC] Protoize hpux-thread.c, i386aix-nat.c
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: [PATCH RFC] Protoize hpux-thread.c, i386aix-nat.c
- From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 17:37:49 -0700
More protoization...
This one was fairly straightforward. I ended up removing the "ignored"
comment from the declaration of hpux_thread_xfer_memory() because the
comment wasn't accurate; TARGET *is* used in this function.
For fetch_core_registers() in i386aix-nat.c, I (effectively) moved the
"ignored" comment to a brand new prefatory comment which I snarfed
(and then edited) from i386-linux-nat.c. My thanks to whomever wrote
this comment.
* i386aix-nat.c (fetch_core_registers): Protoize.
* hpux_thread.c (hpux_thread_xfer_memory): Protoize.
Index: hpux-thread.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/hpux-thread.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 hpux-thread.c
--- hpux-thread.c 2000/07/30 01:48:25 1.4
+++ hpux-thread.c 2000/09/02 00:15:35
@@ -433,12 +433,8 @@
}
static int
-hpux_thread_xfer_memory (memaddr, myaddr, len, dowrite, target)
- CORE_ADDR memaddr;
- char *myaddr;
- int len;
- int dowrite;
- struct target_ops *target; /* ignored */
+hpux_thread_xfer_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, char *myaddr, int len,
+ int dowrite, struct target_ops *target)
{
int retval;
struct cleanup *old_chain;
Index: i386aix-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/i386aix-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 i386aix-nat.c
--- i386aix-nat.c 2000/07/30 01:48:25 1.3
+++ i386aix-nat.c 2000/09/02 00:15:35
@@ -314,12 +314,21 @@
CD_DS, CD_ES, CD_FS, CD_GS,
};
+/* Provide registers to GDB from a core file.
+
+ CORE_REG_SECT points to an array of bytes, which were obtained from
+ a core file which BFD thinks might contain register contents.
+ CORE_REG_SIZE is its size.
+
+ WHICH says which register set corelow suspects this is:
+ 0 --- the general-purpose register set
+ 2 --- the floating-point register set
+
+ REG_ADDR isn't used. */
+
static void
-fetch_core_registers (core_reg_sect, core_reg_size, which, reg_addr)
- char *core_reg_sect;
- unsigned core_reg_size;
- int which;
- CORE_ADDR reg_addr; /* ignored */
+fetch_core_registers (char *core_reg_sect, unsigned core_reg_size,
+ int which, CORE_ADDR reg_addr)
{
if (which == 0)