Re: ftrace

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Tom Tromey wrote:
> > Andrew> The main issues with adopting another getopt alternative are: 
> > that it
> > Andrew> be sane; that we only have one (we're not in the business of
> > Andrew> babysitting multiple redundant packages - which would mean 
> > eliminating
> > Andrew> jargs); and its license be workable.
> >
> > * Sane... well, I think so :-)
> > * Eliminating jargs... at your discretion of course
> > * License... GPL+E like the rest of Classpath
> >
> > Tom
> >   
> In that case "done" :-)
Tom, I just noticed some jargs code still luring (frysk.junit.Runner), 
was that on the delete list or was there a problem?

Andrew