This is the mail archive of the frysk@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the frysk project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch review] Syscall for multi-arch support

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc at cn dot ibm dot com>, frysk <frysk at sourceware dot org>
Date: 15 Sep 2006 11:57:14 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch review] Syscall for multi-arch support
References: <20060908125442.GA1364@GreenHouse.cn.ibm.com> <m3ejul3ojm.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <1158057896.3087.36.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

>> On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 17:51 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> This makes the strace '-e' argument look a little weird now too.  If
>> the user 'ftrace's all 'open' calls, should it be every open call from
>> every ISA?  I suppose we could try to enumerate every ISA supported by
>> the host platform...

Mark> Well a Task knows which Isa it belongs to, so whenever ftrace starts
Mark> tracing a new Task (or rather Proc) it should just reinterpret the '-e'
Mark> argument for that process.

Yeah, I completely forgot the Task->Isa connection.  Thanks.  I made a
note to update ftrace to do this.

Tom

References:
- [patch review] Syscall for multi-arch support
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch review] Syscall for multi-arch support
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch review] Syscall for multi-arch support
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]